
NewsBusters.org, meanwhile, is upset because the New York Times thinks Saddam's trial wasn't fair and his death penalty should be delayed.
With the same solicitude it reserves for politically-correct domestic criminals, the Times editorial of this morning opines that Saddam's trial "fell somewhere short" of "an exemplary exercise in the rule of law." In the Times' view, the trial represented neither "full justice" nor "full fairness."Oh snigglewalther (the strongest epithet I allow myself on this blog). Surely this is one case where the overwhelming evidence to horrific acts predicted Saddam would die. (Another would be if Hitler had survived to face trial). However, Saddam was given an opportunity to explain and defend and, instead, fought against the whole idea of a trial. He, himself, made the trial unfair. So suck it up Saddam, and prepare for your impending martyrdom.






I guess voting by mail is possible due to some programs like Mail Drop isn’t that so? And this is a fiasco war, you say? May be for us, but not for our Administration! Didn’t you know that the most profitable business of all times is war?! Indeed! The more people die, the more money they get.
Posted by: Flamming | August 14, 2007 11:34 AM | Permalink to Comment